KOMENTAR K FINAL AWARD 20
482 … The Tribunal might be prepared to give more weight to the presence of historic
boundary stones, as indicated on Figure 3.8 (a) of Slovenia’s Counter-Memorial. However, upon
review of that map, the Tribunal finds that no boundary stone was placed in the specific area
under consideration here. In the absence of any specific evidence in support of Slovenia’s claimsin the Santavec River area, the Tribunal therefore determines that the boundary follows the
aligned limits of the cadastres of Croatia and Slovenia.
SRHLJIVO – Tudi če se slovenskim ignorantom “po kurje” (slepa kura itd…) posreči pokazati kak relevanten drobec – ali ga ne znajo ali pa nočejo ustrezno podkrepiti (Tribunal finds that no boundary stone was placed in the specific area under consideration here. In the absence of any specific evidence in support of Slovenia’s claimsin…) . Na Dunaju (in v Budimpešti pa se police šibijo od uradnih dokumentov o DRŽAVNI MEJI SLOVENSKIH DEŽEL S KRALJEVINO OGRSKO***. Seveda v katalogu je ne najdeš, še vtipkaš “Croatia” ali pa “Hrvatska”….
PONOVNO IN SPET KOT MEDKLIC: NAMESTO ARGUMENTOV, KAKRŠNE TERJA SPORAZUM O ARBITRAŽI IN SO VES ČAS PRI ROKI NA TAK ALI DRUGAČEN NAČIN, SO SLOVENSKI STROKOVNJAKI IN POOBLAŠČENCI PREDLOŽILI TRIBUNALU NIČVREDNE PAPIRJE, KI NE IZPOLNJUJEJO OSNOVNIH KRITERIJEV, ZAPISANIH V 4. IN 5. ČLENU SPORAZUMA O ARBITRAŽI, ČE PA SE JIM JE – NA KDO VE KATERI NAČIN – VENDARLE POSREČILO (?) NA IZO DATI KAKŠEN USTREZEN PAPIR ALI PODATEK, GA OČITNO ALI NISO ZNALI ALI PA NE HOTELI PRAVILNO IN ARGUMENTIRANO PRESTAVITI.
NADVSE POMEMBNO PA JE JASNO IZRAŽENO STALIŠČE/IZHODIŠČE, KI GA TRIBUNAL V SLEDEČIH TOČKAH ŠE POSEBEJ POUDARJENO POVE:
Točka: 24. On Slovenia’s account:
In September 1941, the Slovenian People’s Liberation Committee (Slovenski
narodnoosvobodilni odbor, SNOO) – which later became the Slovenian People’s Liberation
Council (Slovenski narodnoosvobodilni svet, SNOS) – was created by the Executive
Committee of the Liberation Front (Izvršni odbor Osvobodilne fronte, IOOF). In the
occupied territory of the later Croatia, the National Anti-Fascist Council of the People’s
Liberation of Croatia (Zemaljsko antifašističko vijeće narodnog oslobođenja Hrvatske,
ZAVNOH) was created in 1942; it was renamed in 1945 the People’s Parliament of Croatia
(Hrvatski narodni sabor). At the federal level, the Anti-Fascist Council of People’s
Liberation of Yugoslavia (Antifašističko Vijeće Narodnog Oslobođenja Jugoslavije, AVNOJ)
established in 1942, assumed civil authority as the political umbrella organ of the liberation
movements. It proclaimed, in November 1943, the Democratic Federation of Yugoslavia
(DFY) and assumed itself the functions of the interim legislative body of the Federation. In
addition, it appointed the National Committee for the Liberation of Yugoslavia (Nacionalni
komite osvoboditve Jugoslavije, NKOJ) to act as the interim executive authority.22
(EVIDENTNO SAMOZVANI ORGANI – SEVEDA: ČE DRUGIH/DRUGEGA NI – SAJ VEMO: “V SILI VOL…”
Točka 684. The Tribunal will not enter into an in-depth analysis of all the legal consequences of those pieces
of legislation. It will be enough for it to observe that those domestic laws could not have nullified
the international boundary established by the Treaty of Rapallo, which was the boundary between
Italy and Yugoslavia under international law from 1920 to 1947. The Tribunal will add that the
purpose of those pieces of legislation was not to nullify the Treaty of Rapallo. Rather, they were
only enacted to determine the law applicable in the territory attached to Yugoslavia under the
Treaty of Paris.
(ZA SLOVENSKO “STROKO” , POLITIKO IN DIPLOMACIJO UNIČUJOČA DISKVALIFIKACIJA !!!)
V LONG PRESS RELEASE PA: Istria Region
In the Istria region, the Tribunal considers a series of disputed areas near Leskova Dolina and Snežnik in
Slovenia and Prezid in Croatia. These areas have been referred to by the Parties as the “Tomšič plots”, on
account of their former owner. The Tribunal analyses whether the boundary between the Parties may be based
on the 1920 Treaty of Rapallo although the Treaty was rejected by partisan organisations in 1943 as well as by
subsequent legislation in 1946 and 1947. The Tribunal finds those declarations or Yugoslav legislation could not have nullified the international boundary established by the Treaty of Rapallo. As a consequence, the
former boundary between Italy and Yugoslavia, as it stood from 1920 to 1947, became the border between the
two Republics and is now the boundary between the Parties. The disputed areas referred to as the “Tomšič
plots” are thus located in Slovenia.
KLAVRNA PODOBA SLOVENSKE STROKE, KI ZASMRAJA PLEMENITO PODROČJE INTERNACIONALNEGA PRAVA, JE “PO ZASLUGI JASNE BESEDE ARBITRAŽNEGA TRIBUNALA” POSEBEJ NA OČEH V TEH NEKAJ TOČKAH.
SEVEDA NI DOVOLJENO SPREGLEDATI, DA GRE ZA ARBITRIRANJE, IN TRIBUNAL NI MOGEL PO SVOJE USTVARJATI ARGUMENTOV – ČE JIH NIHČE NI “DAL NA MIZO”. NI PA NOBENEGA DVOMA, DA JE LE MINIMALNO PRIKRITA “ZADIRČNOST” (JEZA?) TRIBUNALA, KI JO JE ČUTITI V DIKCIJI TEH TOČK, IZRAZ OGORČENJA, SAJ MENDA VEMO, DA JE STROKOVNJAKOM (TUJIM), VKLJUČENIM V DELO TRIBUNALA BILO ŠE KAKO JASNO, KAKŠNE VSE ARGUMENTE IMA REPUBLIKA SLOVENIJA NA SVOJI STRANI.
“ZADIRČNOST” – “JEZA” VERJETNO NI NAMENJENA AVNOJSKIM DOKUMENTOM, PARTIZANSKEMU PRAVU IN JUGOSOCIALISTIČNI PSEVDOPRAVNI EKVILIBRISTIKI – KAR TRIBUNAL ODLOČNO POMETE Z MIZE OB SOOČENJU Z URADNO DOLOČENO MEDDRŽAVNO MEJO. ZARADI TAKIH EKSOTOV SE RESNI STROKOVNJAKI NE RAZBURJAJO. ZA MALO PA SE JIM GOTOVO ZDI, ČE STRANKA V POSTOPKU DELUJE INFANTILNO, NEPRAVNO, NERESNO.
Naslovnica ustave z leta 1946 je nazorna slika dejanskega stanja: ne gre za nobeno “federacijo držav”
marveč za združena (“federirana”) LJUDSTVA – dokaz, da gre v slovenski verziji za enak pomen in na enak način uporabljeno besedo, je v “originalu” ustave iz leta 1963:
“narodi Jugoslavije” – torej LJUDSTVA ! so se “ujedinila” v republiko JUGOSLAVIJO, ki je država!, kar dodatno potrdi “dio prvi”: “…je savezna DRŽAVA … LJUDSTEV” !!!!
O pojmu in besedi NAROD (v originalu! seveda – SRPSKOHRVATSKO – ENGLESKI REČNIK, PROSVETA, BEOGRAD, 1977):
NAROD = people, ethnic group… (French people or the French, Croatians, German, the Serbs…),
common people, common folk, crowd….. (krdelo)
evidentno gre za identiteto, ki je ne določa POTNI LIST, marveč spermatozoidi, namreč:
NARODITI = to bear, to be born….
PRIPISOVATI KAKRŠENKOLI DRŽAVNOSTNI ATRIBUT JUGOSOCIALISTIČNEMU “NARODU”, NARODNIM ORGANOM, (v slovenščini “ljudskim…”) JE ALI PRERAČUNLJIVA LAŽ ALI PA SLABOUMNOST, KI POTREBUJE TRETMA.
(KOMENTAR NI POTREBEN)
_________________________________
OPOMBA:
***) Iz uradnega odgovora Urada Predsednika Republike Avstrije, Van der Bellena, 24.08.2017:
“…Concerning historical borders of territories having formed part of Austria-Hungary, as referred
to in your e-mail, extensive collections of relevant records and maps kept in Austrian state
archives are available for research purposes and can be studied by interested scholars and
experts on their request.”
Yours sincerely,…