Ta del je posebej zanimiv zaradi terminologije, ki jo uporablja / sprejema tribunal – je pa totalno v opreki z dejstvi in dejanskim stanjem stvari.
Zadeva je že večkrat temeljito obdelana, zato je tu ni potrebno posebej elaborirati. Zadošča specialka, sočasni izdelek vrhunske stroke.
Ni nobenega dvoma, da sta DRŽAVI (po solovensko DEŽELI) Primorska (Küstenland) in Krajnska (Krain) mejili na Kraljevino Ogrsko (UNGARN piše na karti),
ne pa na neko POKRAJINO Hrvaško…
KOMENTARJI K FINAL AWARD 12
345 ….
“Stranki se strinjata…” = 345. The areas that are not in dispute had been identified by both Parties as those in which the cadastral limits of neighbouring Croatian and Slovenian districts coincided and were “aligned”. The same position was taken in the exercise undertaken in 1991-1996 by the Expert Group established by the Parties.
…
(komunistična komunalna – katastrska ureditev….)
349. In any case, if the Parties are agreed that the boundary is not disputed in segments where their
cadastral limits are aligned, that agreement is itself sufficient to establish that the aligned limits
constitute the boundary.
KAJ NAJ???
350. The Tribunal is directed to determine the course of the whole of the land boundary.625 The
Tribunal therefore determines that in the undisputed segments the boundary follows the agreed
course.
The Disputed Segments of the Land Boundary
351. In the segments of the boundary where there is no agreed line, the essential task of the Tribunal is the same as it is in all other segments of the boundary: To determine the line according to the criteria stipulated by the two Parties. The Tribunal must, therefore, determine in the disputed areas the course of the boundary prescribed by the law of the SFRY as at 25 June 1991.
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
the cadastral limits are a prima facie indication of the boundary between the two Republics in 1991
In general terms, the following grounds for disagreement can be
distinguished:
a. Cadastral limits depicted on cadastral maps overlap or leave gaps;
b. There is no cadastral limit;
c. The boundary must be determined by the application of some other instrument or
criterion.
STRAŠNE MUKE……….
357:
For the avoidance of doubt, the Tribunal reiterates that, while the present Award fixes
the boundary in such areas with binding effect (as the Parties have requested), the Award does
not preclude the Parties from subsequently reaching agreement between themselves on practical
arrangements concerning the boundary.
VSE SO DALE NA MIZO RS in RH…
B. DISPUTED SEGMENTS OF THE LAND BOUNDARY
359. Both Parties divide the land boundary into three regions or sectors—the Mura River Region, the
Central Region and the Istria Region—each of which presents distinct historical characteristics.630
Croatia defines the Istria Region consistently with the limits of historic Istria under the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy.631 It thus divides the Istria Region from the Central Region at the tripoint
of the border of the historical Kingdom of Croatia with the borders of the Austrian Crown Lands of the Littoral and Carniola(!!!).632 The Central Region ends, and the Mura River Region begins,
where Croatia’s historic boundary with Austria ended and its boundary with the Kingdom of
Hungary began.633 Slovenia’s definition of the three regions, on the other hand, is related to
differences in the applicable law (or legal title) in each region.634 Slovenia criticizes Croatia’s
historical approach and asserts that the division used by the Expert Group is more appropriate.635
KATASTROFALNA IGNORANCA UGLEDNIH(?) STROKOVNJAKOV(?)
Tribunal očitno povzema pravljičarstvo Zgb. Že leta 1867 /68 so v Budimpešti preprosto vrgli hrvaške poslance iz parlamenta. Potem so se izvržki igrali “obstrukcijo” (???), a vse do 1918 jim ni uspelo priti do statusa. Ogrska je bila enovita in nedeljiva, ni bilo nobene “Croatie”, Karl oktobra 1918 ni mogel v preureditev države vključiti svoje Kraljevine Ogrske, ker Budimpešta ni hotela niti slišati ničesar v zvezi z ZGB, zato je pač Ogrsko pustil v nemar in sestavil Manifest “samo” za Cislajtanijo.
Velja ponovno(!!!) opozoriti, da slovenske (in druge cislajtanske) dežele niso bile nobene “avstrijske kronske dežele”!!! Za razliko od pokrajine Hrvaške (in Slavonije) znotraj Ogrske, ki je sodila POD (!!!) ogrsko krono (NADVLADO!!! – zato “dežele ogrske Krone”!!!) so bile ves čas, z ustavnim aktom Ausgleich leta 1867 pa tudi dokončno na moderni internacionalni ravni, suvereni subjekti internacionalnega prava z LASTNIM suverenom (ki je bil hkrati tudi suveren preostalih dežel Cislajtanije – vsake posebej!), ki je nosil DRUŽINSKI NASLOV (primerjaj Cesarski patent 1804) “Cesar Avstrije” (to je podobno ureditvi znotraj RKC, ko “naslovni škofje” = samo častni naziv, nosijo ime NIČ VEČ ali SPLOH NE OBSTOJEČE ŠKOFIJE!). Suveren vseh dežel Cislajtanije ( in vsake posebej) je bil tudi kralj Ogrske. Ob kronanju je prisegel na celovitost in nedeljivost “dežel ogrske krone” – kar v prevodu pomeni: pokrajin pod neposrendo oblastjo Budimpešte!!! Slovenske (in ostale “Astrijske” = terminus technicus) dežele pa so bile “pod” lastno krono – “Avstrijske krone” NI BILO!!!!
Kaj je bilo onkraj državnih meja DEŽEL Primorske in Krajnske (že v času Avstrijskega cesarsta = do 1848/67), pokaže uradna specialna karta izpred leta 1848, ki jo je kustos državnega muzej Krajnske posvetil vojvodi svoje države – dežele Krajnske, po naslovu “Cesarju Avstrije” in dejanskemu kralju Ogrske. Države Primorska in Krajnska mejijo na Kraljevino Ogrsko (UNGARN):
SPECIALNA KARTA DRŽAVE VOJVODINE KRAJNSKE posvečena suverenu, naslovnemu Avstrijskemu cesarju Ferdinandu Prvemu